Ertapenem in the treatment of ESBL E. coli

in ESBL

Of 71 patients who met the study criteria, nine died within 3 days. Among the 62 remaining patients who received definitive antimicrobial therapy, 13 died within 30 days. Male gender, ICU stay, solid tumor, and primary bacteremia were independent predictors of 30-day mortality, whereas definitive antimicrobial therapy using either ertapenem or imipenem/meropenem was protective (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Adjustment by propensity score found that ertapenem appeared to exhibit more favorable outcomes, but the difference fell short of statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.02, p=0.06). Inappropriate initial therapy was not a significant predictor of mortality.

Conclusions

ICU stay, but not initial choice of empirical antimicrobial therapy, was a major predictor of mortality. Using a carbapenem as definitive therapy was a protective factor for 30-day mortality. The choice of ertapenem is reasonable for less severely-ill patients who are at risk of ESBL-EC bacteremia and unlikely to have infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

via Ertapenem in the treatment of bacteremia caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: a propensity score analysis.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: